Acquiring Minds
← Back to all episodes
Caroline Chapdelaine·April 27, 2023

How to Buy a Carve-Out Business | Caroline Chapdelaine Interview

Open on YouTube ↗

Caroline Chapdelaine is an Army veteran (intelligence officer, combat tour in Afghanistan) who discovered ETA through Wharton's EMBA program and set out as a self-funded searcher targeting defense contractors. In 2022 she led the carve-out of North Star Photonics — a 13-person maker of premium fiber-optic gyroscope components (IOCAs) used on military jets, missiles, and satellites — from a biomed parent company that wanted the business off its books. The deal closed at $600k upfront (all equity from three partners) plus a $1m earnout, with Caroline holding a minority stake and serving as CEO. Immediately post-close, the company had to relocate its specialized clean-room facility in San Jose; the move cost roughly three times the original quote, and the primary customer's mandatory production audit pushed revenue out by four months, nearly exhausting the company's cash. At her lowest, Caroline asked employees for temporary pay cuts and began planning a wind-down, before a Wharton-era tip led her to a local Utah bank that issued a ~$500k SBA 7(a) loan secured entirely against the company's ~$1m equipment assets — no personal guarantee required. By the time of recording the customer audit had just passed, the SBA loan was imminent, and the company was weeks away from resumed shipments. The episode is a detailed case study in carve-out complexity, cash-crisis management, the unexpected value of asset-heavy businesses for post-close financing, and the psychological demands of entrepreneurship on someone accustomed to high-stakes military environments.

Deal facts

purchase price
$1.6m total ($600k upfront + $1m earnout over 3 years)
sde ebitda
EBITDA ~$300k (pre-overhead absorption)
revenue
~$2m
financing structure
All-equity for $600k upfront (three partners pooled cash); $1m earnout over 3 years cash-flowed from contracts; no acquisition debt; post-close SBA 7(a) loan ~$500k secured against ~$1m in equipment assets
notes
Carve-out from a biomed parent company (North Star Photonics). Three partners: Caroline (minority equity, CEO role), chief scientist (majority equity), and a board-member/sales partner (second-largest equity). ~$1m in lab/equipment assets on balance sheet. Clean room relocation to San Jose required significant unplanned capex post-close. Moving costs came in ~3x original quote.

Why this business

Caroline had a defense industry background (operations, supply chain at Northrop Grumman, L3 Harris, Orbital ATK) and was specifically targeting defense contractors because she understood the technology, contracts, and relationships. She had done consulting work for the photonics spin-out a year prior and knew the people. When the partners approached her, she was convinced by the premium, differentiated technology (fiber optic gyroscope components with a wide moat from trade secrets and decades of PhD expertise), the quality of the team, and a desire not to keep waiting for a better deal. She accepted a minority stake because she wanted the chance to lead a company and recognized the partnership made success more likely than going alone.

What's working

  • Highly differentiated, proprietary photonics technology (IOCA components for fiber optic gyroscopes) with a wide competitive moat built from decades of trade secrets and PhD expertise that even large primes cannot easily replicate or reverse-engineer
  • Strategic customer dependency — the primary customer's own success depends on North Star Photonics surviving, leading to prepayments and active support through the transition
  • Asset-heavy balance sheet (~$1m in equipment) that was initially seen as a liability but enabled an SBA 7(a) loan without personal guarantees when the company hit a cash crisis
  • Strong, experienced technical team (13 employees, half scientists/engineers, half skilled assemblers, many with 20-30 years on this exact technology) who stayed through the carve-out
  • Partnership structure: three complementary partners (CEO/operator, chief scientist, and a sales board member with 20+ years in related industries) provided resilience during the crisis and broader decision-making capacity
  • Government contracts providing baseline recurring revenue once production resumed

What's hard

  • Carve-out structure meant losing all parent-company infrastructure (HR, IT, facilities) instantly, creating a de facto startup situation that most banks refused to finance
  • Mandatory relocation of a complex clean-room facility within two months of close; moving costs came in roughly three times the original quote
  • Primary customer required a formal production and quality audit at the new San Jose facility before allowing any shipments, creating a ~4-month revenue gap (October close to April approval) that nearly exhausted all equity
  • Cash crisis forced the company to ask employees to take temporary pay cuts (offset with PTO), and management had to explore equity raises, personal loans, and bank debt under pressure
  • Remote CEO situation: Caroline is based in Salt Lake City while the business operates in San Jose, requiring bi-weekly travel and reliance on the chief scientist for day-to-day operations
  • Single-technology, narrow-market business (only government customers currently) with key-person risk concentrated in a small team of senior scientists
  • Psychological toll: Caroline described facing her lowest personal lows, developing anxiety and insomnia, and having to reckon with the threat of complete failure for the first time despite a decorated military background

Notable quotes

since buying this business I have had days more stressful than my combat tour in Afghanistan but I am still happy I did it
I thought when I went into ETA that you know I'm a veteran I've been shot at in Afghanistan like I've seen hard times and did okay brought everyone home safely if I can run a business that can't be more stressful — I was wrong it turns out it is more stressful but in a different way
running out of cash to me felt like the ultimate failure because now we were putting in personal money we were asking employees to take a hit to their pay and for me this felt like if you're doing this you are a failure as a CEO and that was tough to swallow
I went into this and maybe they did too we haven't really unpacked it yet fully but not counting on this to make me Millions I mean it'd be really cool if it did but even if this is just something interesting that we all get to do together for a few years and we don't get to you know run off with all the money at the end such a great opportunity to get to work with these two
I was adamant about not having partners I wanted to go do this by myself and prove I could — boy naive me back then has learned a thing or two

Tags